SER recommendations on treatment of refractory Behçet's syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations based on available evidence and expert consensus for the therapeutic management of patients with refractory Behçet's syndrome (BS) (difficult to treat, severe resistant, severe relapse) to conventional treatment. METHODS: A group of experts identified clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document. These questions were reformulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison and outcome). Systematic reviews of the evidence were conducted, the quality of the evidence was evaluated following the methodology of the international working group Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). After that, the multidisciplinary panel formulated the specific recommendations. RESULTS: 4 PICO questions were selected regarding the efficacy and safety of systemic pharmacological treatments in patients with BS with clinical manifestations refractory to conventional therapy related to mucocutaneous and/or articular, vascular, neurological parenchymal and gastrointestinal phenotypes. A total of 7 recommendations were made, structured by question, based on the identified evidence and expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of most severe clinical manifestations of BS lacks solid scientific evidence and, besides, there are no specific recommendation documents for patients with refractory disease. With the aim of providing a response to this need, here we present the first official Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the management of these patients. They are devised as a tool for assistance in clinical decision making, therapeutic homogenisation and to reduce variability in the care of these patients.

Recomendaciones SER sobre el tratamiento del síndrome de Behçet refractario / SER recommendations on treatment of refractory Behçet's syndrome

Objetivo: Elaborar recomendaciones multidisciplinares, basadas en la evidencia disponible y el consenso de expertos, para el manejo terapéutico de los pacientes con síndrome de Behçet refractario (difícil de tratar, resistente grave, recidivante grave) al tratamiento convencional. Métodos: Un panel de expertos identificó preguntas clínicas de investigación relevantes para el objetivo del documento. Estas preguntas fueron reformuladas en formato PICO –paciente, intervención, comparación, outcome o desenlace–. A continuación, se realizaron revisiones sistemáticas; la evaluación de la calidad de la evidencia se realizó siguiendo la metodología del grupo internacional de trabajo Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Tras esto, el panel multidisciplinar formuló las recomendaciones. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 4 preguntas PICO relativas a la eficacia y seguridad de los tratamientos farmacológicos sistémicos en los pacientes con síndrome de Behçet con manifestaciones clínicas refractarias a terapia convencional, relacionadas con los fenotipos mucocutáneo y/o articular, vascular, neurológico-parenquimatoso y gastrointestinal. Se formularon un total de 7 recomendaciones estructuradas por pregunta, con base en la evidencia encontrada y el consenso de expertos. Conclusiones: El tratamiento de las manifestaciones clínicas más graves del síndrome de Behçet carece de evidencia científica sólida y no existen documentos de recomendaciones específicas para los pacientes con enfermedad refractaria a la terapia convencional. Con el fin de aportar una respuesta a esta necesidad, se presenta el primer documento de recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología específicas para el abordaje terapéutico de estos pacientes, que servirá de ayuda en la toma de decisiones clínica y la reducción de la variabilidad en la atención.(AU)

Objective: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations based on available evidence and expert consensus for the therapeutic management of patients with refractory Behçet's syndrome (difficult to treat, severe resistant, severe relapse) to conventional treatment. Methods: A group of experts identified clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document. These questions were reformulated in PICO format –patient, intervention, comparison and outcome–. Systematic reviews of the evidence were conducted; the quality of the evidence was evaluated following the methodology of the international working group Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. After that, the multidisciplinary panel formulated the specific recommendations. Results: Four PICO questions were selected regarding the efficacy and safety of systemic pharmacological treatments in patients with Behçet's syndrome with clinical manifestations refractory to conventional therapy related to mucocutaneous and/or articular, vascular, neurological parenchymal and gastrointestinal phenotypes. A total of 7 recommendations were made, structured by question, based on the identified evidence and expert consensus. Conclusions: The treatment of most severe clinical manifestations of Behçet's syndrome lacks solid scientific evidence and, besides, there are no specific recommendation documents for patients with refractory disease. With the aim of providing a response to this need, here we present the first official recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the management of these patients. They are devised as a tool for assistance in clinical decision making, therapeutic homogenisation and to reduce variability in the care of these patients.(AU)

Recomendaciones SER sobre la utilización de fármacos biológicos en el síndrome de Sjögren primario / SER recommendations on the use of biological drugs in primary Sjögren's syndrome

OBJETIVO: Elaborar recomendaciones SER sobre el uso de agentes biológicos en el síndrome de Sjögren primario (SSp). MÉTODOS: Se identificaron preguntas clínicas de investigación relevantes sobre el uso de agentes biológicos en el SSp. Las preguntas clínicas se reformularon en 4 preguntas PICO. Se diseñó una estrategia de búsqueda y se realizó una revisión de la evidencia científica de estudios publicados hasta mayo de 2017. Se revisó sistemáticamente la evidencia científica disponible. Se evaluó el nivel global de la evidencia científica utilizando los niveles de evidencia del SIGN. Tras ello, se formularon recomendaciones específicas. RESULTADOS: Se recomienda rituximab como el fármaco biológico de elección para las manifestaciones extraglandulares refractarias al tratamiento convencional. Se desaconseja el uso de agentes anti-TNF. La evidencia científica es escasa con belimumab y abatacept, por lo que deberían considerarse solamente en los casos resistentes a rituximab. CONCLUSIONES: El rituximab es el fármaco biológico de elección en las manifestaciones graves extraglandulares del SSp. Belimumab o abatacept podrían ser de utilidad en casos seleccionados

OBJECTIVE: To formulate SER recommendations for the use of biological agents in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). METHODS: Relevant clinical research questions were identified on the use of biological agents in pSS. The clinical questions were reformulated into 4 PICO questions. A search strategy was designed and a review of the scientific evidence of studies published until May 2017 was carried out. The scientific evidence available was systematically reviewed. The overall level of scientific evidence was assessed using the SIGN evidence levels. After that, specific recommendations were made. RESULTS: Rituximab is recommended as the biological agent of choice for extraglandular manifestations refractory to conventional treatment. The use of anti-TNF agents is discouraged. The scientific evidence with belimumab and abatacept is scarce, so they should be considered only in cases refractory to rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is the biological agent of choice in severe extraglandular manifestations of pSS. Belimumab or abatacept may be useful in selected cases

SER recommendations on the use of biological drugs in primary Sjögren's syndrome. / Recomendaciones SER sobre la utilización de fármacos biológicos en el síndrome de Sjögren primario.

OBJECTIVE: To formulate SER recommendations for the use of biological agents in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). METHODS: Relevant clinical research questions were identified on the use of biological agents in pSS. The clinical questions were reformulated into 4PICO questions. A search strategy was designed and a review of the scientific evidence of studies published until May 2017 was carried out. The scientific evidence available was systematically reviewed. The overall level of scientific evidence was assessed using the SIGN evidence levels. After that, specific recommendations were made. RESULTS: Rituximab is recommended as the biological agent of choice for extraglandular manifestations refractory to conventional treatment. The use of anti-TNF agents is discouraged. The scientific evidence with belimumab and abatacept is scarce, so they should be considered only in cases refractory to rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is the biological agent of choice in severe extraglandular manifestations of pSS. Belimumab or abatacept may be useful in selected cases.

Adult-onset Still's disease with atypical cutaneous manifestations.

The diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) can be very difficult. There are no specific tests available, and diagnosis is usually based on a symptom complex and the well-described typical evanescent rash seen in the majority of patients. However, in recent years, other atypical cutaneous manifestations of AOSD have been reported. These atypical skin eruptions often present in addition to the typical evanescent rash but may also be the only skin manifestation, resulting in delayed diagnosis because of under-recognition.In this study, we present 3 new cases of AOSD with atypical cutaneous manifestations diagnosed during a 30-year period in our department and review 78 additional cases previously reported (PubMed 1990-2016). These 81 patients form the basis of the present analysis.The overall prevalence of atypical cutaneous manifestations in our AOSD population was 14%. These manifestations may appear at any time over the course of the disease, and usually occur in patients who have persistent and severe disease, with a considerable frequency of clinical complications (23%), including serositis, myopericarditis, lung involvement, abdominal pain, neurologic involvement, and reactive hemophagocytic syndrome.The most representative and frequent lesion among the nonclassical skin rashes is the development of persistent pruritic papules and/or plaques. Interestingly, these lesions show a distinctive histological pattern. Other, less frequently observed lesions include urticaria and urticaria-like eruptions, generalized or widespread non-pruritic persistent erythema, vesiculopustular eruptions, a widespread peau d'orange appearance of the skin, and edema of the eyelids mimicking dermatomyositis without any accompanying skin lesion.The great majority of these patients required medium or high doses of glucocorticoids (including intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy in some cases) and, in nearly 40%, a more potent or maintenance immunotherapy with immunosuppressant drugs and/or biologic agents (mainly anakinra or tocilizumab) to control or manage symptoms because of a polycyclic or chronic course. The development of atypical cutaneous manifestations seems to be associated with a potentially worse prognosis, with a mortality rate reaching 8% primarily because of infectious complications related to immunosuppressive therapy.In conclusion, the appearance of atypical cutaneous manifestations is not uncommon in AOSD. Recognition of this clinical variant is crucial for the early diagnosis of AOSD, as it might imply persistent disease activity and the need for more aggressive treatment.

Qué, cómo, cuándo y hasta cuándo tratar una artritis indiferenciada / Treating undifferentiated arthritis. What, when, how and how long?

Con la instauración de las clínicas de artritis de reciente comienzo se valoran pacientes cada vez más precozmente en el curso de su enfermedad, por lo que un porcentaje importante de éstos aún no puede clasificarse dentro de un diagnóstico específico según los criterios de clasificación del American College of Rheumatology (ACR). En estos pacientes con artritis indiferenciada (AI) incluso más importante que establecer un diagnóstico es distinguir entre aquéllos que desarrollarán una artritis persistente y/o erosiva y, por tanto, serán candidatos a recibir tratamiento precoz con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME) aunque no cumplan los criterios de clasificación del ACR, y los que tendrán un cuadro autolimitado. Los marcadores serológicos junto con las características clínicas en el momento de la presentación, integrados en modelos clínicos predictivos, son los instrumentos con los que actualmente cuenta el clínico para poder identificar a estos pacientes. Algunos estudios han demostrado las ventajas del tratamiento precoz en la AI (AU)

With the establishment of early arthritis clinics, patients can now be increasingly attended early in the course of their disease. This means that a significant proportion of these patients cannot be classified into a specific diagnosis using the traditional American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria. In these patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA), even more important than assigning a diagnosis is the need to distinguish between patients who will develop a persistent and/or erosive disease and will be candidates for prompt treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), and patients in whom the disease is self-limiting. Serologic markers in combination with clinical features at presentation, integrated into predictive models, are the tools currently available to the clinician for identifying these patients. Several studies have demonstrated the advantages of early treatment in UA (AU)